Non-compete checker
Pick your state and enter your pay. You get the state’s main non-compete rule, how your pay compares with any dollar figure in the law, and any separate rules for health care workers — each quoted from the official text.
The federal rule
On September 5, 2025, the FTC moved to dismiss its appeals in Ryan, LLC v. FTC and Properties of the Villages v. FTC and to accede to vacatur of the Non-Compete Clause Rule.
“Today the Federal Trade Commission took steps to dismiss its appeals in Ryan, LLC v. FTC, No. 24-10951 (5th Cir.), and Properties of the Villages v. FTC, No. 24-13102 (11th Cir.), and to accede to the vacatur of the Non-Compete Clause Rule.”
FTC press release, Sept. 5, 2025
The FTC's final rule removes the Non-Compete Rule (16 CFR part 910) from the Code of Federal Regulations.
“With the Commission having now acceded to vacatur, this final rule removes the Non-Compete Rule codified at 16 CFR part 910 from the Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”).”
91 Fed. Reg. (Feb. 12, 2026), FR Doc. 2026-02866
Every state at a glance
| State | Main rule we verified |
|---|---|
| Alabama | Alabama voids contracts restraining anyone from exercising a lawful profession, trade, or business, except as provided in § 8-1-190. |
| Alaska | No statute on employee non-competes found on an official state site. |
| Arizona | It is unlawful for a broadcast employer (TV or radio station or network) to require a current or prospective employee to agree to a noncompete clause as a condition of employment. |
| Arkansas | Act 232 of 2025 added Ark. Code § 4-75-101(k): a covenant not to compete restricting a physician's right to practice within the physician's scope of practice is void. |
| California | California law voids contracts that restrain anyone from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business, except as provided in the chapter. |
| Colorado | As amended in 2025, a covenant not to compete restricting an individual's right to receive compensation for labor is void, except as provided in listed subsections. |
| Connecticut | A physician non-compete is valid only if necessary to protect a legitimate business interest, reasonably limited in time, geography, and practice scope, and consistent with law and public policy; the enforcing party bears the burden of proof. |
| Delaware | Delaware voids non-compete provisions in agreements among physicians that restrict practicing medicine in a locale or for a period after the agreement ends; other provisions, including reasonable damages, remain enforceable. |
| District of Columbia | Beginning October 1, 2022, employers may not require or request that a covered (non-highly-compensated) employee sign or comply with a non-compete provision. |
| Florida | Florida allows enforcement of contracts restricting competition if they are reasonable in time, area, and line of business. |
| Georgia | No statute on employee non-competes found on an official state site. |
| Hawaii | Hawaii prohibits noncompete and nonsolicit clauses in employment contracts of employees of a technology business; such clauses are void (trade-secret covenants under (c)(4) excepted). |
| Idaho | Idaho permits a key employee or key independent contractor to agree to a non-compete that is reasonable in duration, area, and type of work and no greater than reasonably necessary. |
| Illinois | A covenant not to compete or not to solicit is illegal and void unless five conditions are met, including adequate consideration and being no greater than required to protect a legitimate business interest. |
| Indiana | Since July 1, 2023, a primary care physician and an employer may not enter into a noncompete agreement (not applicable to agreements originally entered before July 1, 2023). |
| Iowa | An employer may not enter into an agreement with a licensed mental health professional limiting where they may practice, barring contact with prior patients, or imposing a time restriction on practice. |
| Kansas | The Kansas restraint of trade act is not to be construed to apply to franchise agreements or covenants not to compete. |
| Kentucky | No statute on employee non-competes found on an official state site. |
| Louisiana | Louisiana voids contracts restraining anyone from exercising a lawful profession, trade, or business, except as provided in the section. |
| Maine | Maine treats noncompete agreements as contrary to public policy, enforceable only if reasonable and no broader than necessary to protect trade secrets, confidential information, or goodwill. |
| Maryland | For covered employees, a noncompete or conflict-of-interest provision restricting work for a new employer or self-employment in the same or similar business is null and void. |
| Massachusetts | A noncompetition agreement is valid and enforceable only if it meets minimum requirements (i) through (viii) of the statute. |
| Michigan | Michigan allows an employer to obtain a non-compete protecting reasonable competitive business interests if it is reasonable in duration, geographic area, and type of employment or line of business. |
| Minnesota | In Minnesota, any covenant not to compete in a contract or agreement is void and unenforceable, subject to listed exceptions. |
| Mississippi | No statute on employee non-competes found on an official state site. |
| Missouri | Missouri's statute makes reasonable written employee non-solicitation (no-recruit/no-hire) covenants enforceable in listed circumstances. |
| Montana | Montana voids contracts restraining anyone from exercising a lawful profession, trade, or business, except as provided in 28-2-704 or 28-2-705. |
| Nebraska | A health care staffing agency may not include in any contract with a worker or health care entity a noncompete clause restricting the worker's employment opportunities; a violating clause is void. |
| Nevada | Nevada allows noncompetition covenants only if they meet statutory conditions; a covenant that does not meet them is void and unenforceable. |
| New Hampshire | Employers may not require low-wage employees to sign noncompete agreements, and such agreements with low-wage employees are void and unenforceable. |
| New Jersey | No statute on employee non-competes found on an official state site. |
| New Mexico | For listed health care practitioners, a non-compete restricting clinical health care services in New Mexico is unenforceable once the agreement, its renewal, or the practitioner's employment ends. |
| New York | No statute on employee non-competes found on an official state site. |
| North Carolina | In North Carolina, an agreement limiting a person's right to do business anywhere in the state is not enforceable unless it is in writing and signed by the person agreeing not to compete. |
| North Dakota | North Dakota makes void any contract restraining someone from exercising a lawful profession, trade or business, except for the listed sale-of-business and owner-dissolution situations. |
| Ohio | No statute on employee non-competes found on an official state site. |
| Oklahoma | Oklahoma makes void any contract restraining someone from exercising a lawful profession, trade or business, except as provided in the listed statutory exceptions. |
| Oregon | Oregon allows employee noncompetition agreements only when listed conditions are all met; an agreement that does not meet them is void and unenforceable. |
| Pennsylvania | For covered health care practitioners, Pennsylvania deems a noncompete covenant entered into after the effective date void and unenforceable by an employer, except as provided in the one-year exception. |
| Rhode Island | Rhode Island makes noncompetition agreements unenforceable against four listed groups of workers: FLSA nonexempt employees, student interns or short-term student workers, employees 18 or younger, and low-wage employees. |
| South Carolina | No statute on employee non-competes found on an official state site. |
| South Dakota | South Dakota makes void any contract restraining a lawful profession, trade or business, except as provided in sections 53-9-9 through 53-9-12. |
| Tennessee | A noncompete agreement executed in violation of the $70,000 rule is void and unenforceable as a matter of public policy. |
| Texas | Texas enforces a covenant not to compete if it is ancillary to or part of an otherwise enforceable agreement and its time, geographic and activity limits are reasonable and no greater than necessary to protect the goodwill or other business interest of the promisee. |
| Utah | A non-compete agreement that violates the one-year limit or the healthcare worker rule is void. |
| Vermont | No statute on employee non-competes found on an official state site. |
| Virginia | Virginia bars employers from entering into, enforcing, or threatening to enforce a covenant not to compete with any low-wage employee or health care professional. |
| Washington | Until June 30, 2027, Washington law lists conditions under which a noncompetition covenant is void and unenforceable (including disclosure, consideration, earnings threshold and layoff conditions). |
| West Virginia | West Virginia limits a physician's covenant not to compete to no more than one year and 30 road miles from the physician's primary place of practice with the employer. |
| Wisconsin | Wisconsin enforces an employee covenant not to compete within a specified territory and time only if the restrictions are reasonably necessary to protect the employer. |
| Wyoming | Wyoming makes void any covenant not to compete that restricts a person's right to be paid for skilled or unskilled labor, subject to listed exceptions. |
States that set a dollar figure
- Colorado: The CDLE 2026 PAY CALC Order (effective February 1, 2026) lists $130,014 annually for 'highly compensated employees'. The order itself does not mention non-competes; the statute ties the non-compete threshold to this division-determined amount. 7 CCR 1103-14 (2026 PAY CALC Order), Rule 1.2.1 row (G)
- District of Columbia: According to DOES, as of January 1, 2026 the restriction applies to employees earning less than $162,164 and medical specialists earning less than $270,274. D.C. DOES Public Notice (2026)
- Illinois: An employer may not enter a covenant not to compete with an employee unless the employee's actual or expected annualized earnings exceed $75,000 per year. 820 ILCS 90/10(a)
- Oregon: Oregon's labor bureau publishes the inflation-adjusted minimum: $116,427 for 2025 and $119,541 for 2026 (salary and commissions must exceed this amount). Oregon BOLI, Noncompetition Agreements page (ORS 653.295)
- Tennessee: Tennessee bars employers from requiring, requesting, or enforcing a noncompete agreement against an employee whose annualized compensation is less than $70,000. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-1-211(a) (2026 Tenn. Pub. Acts ch. 934)
- Virginia: For 2026, Virginia's labor department states that low-wage employees for non-compete purposes include all employees earning an average of less than $1,507.01 per week. Va. Dep't of Labor & Industry, Notice of the Average Weekly Wage for 2026
- Washington: Washington L&I's threshold table lists employee thresholds of $123,394.17 for 2025 and $126,858.83 for 2026. Wash. Dep't of Labor & Industries, Non-Compete Agreements page
Other states tie their line to a multiple of the minimum wage or the federal poverty level: Maine (An employer may not require or permit a noncompete agreement with an employee earning wages at or below 400% of the federal poverty level.); Maryland (The ban covers employees earning equal to or less than 150% of the State minimum wage rate.); New Hampshire (New Hampshire defines a low-wage employee as one earning an hourly rate at or below 200 percent of the federal minimum wage.); Rhode Island (A low-wage employee is one whose average annual earnings are not more than 250% of the federal poverty level for individuals, as set by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services guidelines.).
What we could not verify
For Alaska, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, South Carolina, Vermont we found no statute on employee non-competes on an official state site, so this page states no rule for them. We do not fill those gaps from secondary sources.
Common questions
Is the FTC non-compete ban in effect?
On September 5, 2025, the FTC moved to dismiss its appeals in Ryan, LLC v. FTC and Properties of the Villages v. FTC and to accede to vacatur of the Non-Compete Clause Rule. The FTC's final rule removes the Non-Compete Rule (16 CFR part 910) from the Code of Federal Regulations.
Which states have a salary threshold for non-competes?
States with a plain dollar figure include Colorado, District of Columbia, Illinois, Oregon, Tennessee, Virginia, Washington; Maine, Maryland, New Hampshire, Rhode Island use a multiple of the minimum wage or the federal poverty level.
Have the agreement in front of you?
Upload your offer letter or employment agreement and Main AI finds the non-compete, non-solicitation and confidentiality clauses, reads their length and reach, and lines them up with your state’s rules.
Upload your agreement — free analysisSources
Every legal statement above is taken from these official texts, read on 2026-10-02.
- FTC press release, Sept. 5, 2025
- 91 Fed. Reg. (Feb. 12, 2026), FR Doc. 2026-02866
- Ala. Code § 8-1-190(a)
- A.R.S. § 23-494(A)
- Ark. Code § 4-75-101(k)(1) (Act 232 of 2025)
- Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16600(a)
- C.R.S. § 8-2-113(2)(a) (as amended by SB 25-083, 2025 Colo. Sess. Laws ch. 366)
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 20-14p(b)(1)
- 6 Del. C. § 2707
- D.C. Code § 32-581.02(a)(1)
- Fla. Stat. § 542.335(1)
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 480-4(d)
- Idaho Code § 44-2701
- 820 ILCS 90/15
- IC 25-22.5-5.5-2.5 (SEA 7, 2023)
- Iowa Code § 147.161(2)
- K.S.A. 50-163(e)(6)
- La. R.S. 23:921(A)(1)
- 26 M.R.S. § 599-A(2)
- Md. Code, Lab. & Empl. § 3-716(a)(3)
- M.G.L. c. 149, § 24L(b)
- MCL 445.774a(1)
- Minn. Stat. § 181.988, subd. 2(a)
- Mo. Rev. Stat. § 431.202.1
- Mont. Code Ann. § 28-2-703
- 2026 Neb. Laws, LB 921, § 11 (Health Care Staffing Agency Registration Act)
- NRS 613.195(1)
- N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 275:70-a(II)
- NMSA 1978, § 24A-4-2(A)
- N.C. Gen. Stat. § 75-4
- N.D. Cent. Code § 9-08-06
- Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 217
- ORS 653.295(1)
- Fair Contracting for Health Care Practitioners Act, Act of Jul. 17, 2024, P.L. 846, No. 74, § 4(a)
- R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-59-3(a)
- S.D. Codified Laws § 53-9-8
- Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-1-211(c)
- Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 15.50(a)
- Utah Code § 34-51-201(1)(c)
- Va. Code § 40.1-28.7:8(B)
- RCW 49.62.020(1) (effective until June 30, 2027)
- W. Va. Code § 47-11E-2(a)
- Wis. Stat. § 103.465
- Wyo. Stat. § 1-23-108(a)
- 7 CCR 1103-14 (2026 PAY CALC Order), Rule 1.2.1 row (G)
- D.C. DOES Public Notice (2026)
- Oregon BOLI, Noncompetition Agreements page (ORS 653.295)
- Wash. Dep't of Labor & Industries, Non-Compete Agreements page
- Va. Dep't of Labor & Industry, Notice of the Average Weekly Wage for 2026
This page is general information, not legal advice, and using it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Main AI is not a law firm. Laws change and have exceptions; the linked official text controls. For advice about your situation, contact a licensed attorney or a legal-aid office in your state.